« Government Work | Main | Interactive Budgeting »

February 08, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834519c3c69e20120a86b16ed970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nowhere To Go But Up:

Comments

txgordo

I read somewhere, by someone, if universities eliminated any program with the word 'Studies' appended to it, they could all balance their budgets and lower tuitions. At UVM, you can get a B.A. in Global Studies, which either turns out victim's lawyers or baristas, I imagine.

Chris Campion

I would be less concerned about tuition increases if the financials of UVM looked like somebody had actually done a little math with them. I'm sure a number of folks did, but it's really up to the senior administration and Board to sign off on large scale capital expenditures. That they knowingly relied too heavily on investment income as a percentage of the overall revenues is flatly obvious, and also obviously too much of a risk. The downside to this risk-taking was evidenced in the cutbacks and layoff of staff - none of whom had a vote in the budget approval process.

Vermont Woodchuck

People who have a vote in the budget approval process are the ones who can vote you out of office.

Staff? The peasants get voted ta-ta.

Bill

Even if they had not made foolish investment assumptions, I would'nt give them a dime. Too many ISO communist indoctrination bullies running around up there. If anyone has ever stood up to them, I want to know who that was.

Richard H. Cate, VP for Finance & Administration, UVM

I do not know the source of the data in this story but they are incorrect. The University's debt service in 2002 was slightly less than $6 million (1.7% of the operating budget) and in 2010 it was $27.2 million (4.7% of the operating budget). The industry standard for debt service in higher education ranges from 5% to 9%.

Chris Campion

Richard, the source of the data is from the publicly-available financial statements of the college. My numbers do not reflect the percentage of the entire operating budget; they reflect the percentage of operating revenues - in other words, I wanted to look at how big the P&I was relative to the income stream. I would be happy to send my complete analysis to you if you're interested.

Chris

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Support Vermont Tiger

Newsletter

  • Subscribe to our email newsletter
    Your Email Address

Our Mission

  • Vermont Tiger is a non-partisan, non-profit advocacy and media enterprise. Through a web site, print publications, symposiums and other events, we promote policies and political action aimed at sustained, environmentally-sound economic growth and prosperity in the Green Mountain State. Vermont Tiger is about the future of Vermont … and insuring that it has one.

Quotes

  • Only a crisis—actual or perceived— produces real change. When that crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around. That, I believe, is our basic function: to develop alternatives to existing policies, to keep them alive and available until the politically impossible becomes politically inevitable .... (Milton Friedman)

about us

Subscribe RSS

  • Subscribe via RSS


Powered by Rollyo

Legal

  • Copyright © 2012 Vermont Tiger, All Rights Reserved