According to the Times Argus, Efficiency Vermont has provided advice to GE's aircraft engine plant in Rutland on what types of lights and light fixtures to install. Given that GE has been touting its environmental and efficiency credentials, in an effort to sell more wind turbines, efficient combined cycles, locomotives, etc., it's difficult to believe that EV knows more than GE. But don't despair, they have to get the tax they pay to EV back somehow.
As you ponder EV's role during the upcoming legislative session, ask yourself why, if investments in energy efficiency are, as green-guru Amory Lovins has said, "the lunch you are paid to eat," why must Vermont consumers and businesses subsidize these investments, and fund EV's lavish spending? There's nothing wrong with increasing energy efficiency, of course, just like there's nothing wrong with increasing the efficiency of manufacturing, construction, and everything else. But paying two dollars to save one is never a bargain. Maybe that free lunch isn't all it's cracked up to be.

The Tiger seems to be a bit out of sorts these days. Typically this blog claims that business, make that the free-market, knows all, does all and accomplishes all; and government knows nothing, does nothing and accomplishes zip. Then along comes an article that indicates that government has actually helped business with its (government's) knowledge and shown business how to save money.
"GE Aviation, Husky Injection Molding, FiberMark and C&S Wholesale Grocers are a few of the companies that have taken advantage of Efficiency Vermont's programs and financial incentives to save on their electric bills.
"GE replaced its sodium fixture lighting with more efficient florescent fixtures and bulbs. The switch will save the plants on Windcrest Road and Columbian Avenue a combined $127,000 a year.
"It was clear that this project would pay for itself in a short period of time and also provide future savings for years to come," Charles Barker, facility engineer at GE, said in a statement."
So how does the Tiger respond? It attacks the government, Efficiency Vermont, for helping. Maybe EV is the villian here because they have demonstrated that they are able to provide assistance to a multi-national corporation. What arrogance for government to demonstrate competence!
Posted by: G. Cross | January 08, 2008 at 08:59 AM